DSpace logo

Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorioinstitucional.uea.edu.br//handle/riuea/5517
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorAbreu, Rosângela Santos de-
dc.date.available2024-01-05-
dc.date.available2024-01-08T13:40:12Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioinstitucional.uea.edu.br//handle/riuea/5517-
dc.description.abstractChronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is a neoplasm of hematopoietic stem cells caused by a reciprocal translocation between chromosomes 9;22 that gives rise to an abnormal chromosome 22 called Philadelphia (Ph). This episode results in a BCR::ABL1 fusion oncogene responsible for the pathogenesis of the disease. The incidence of the disease corresponds to 15% of all leukemias in adults, with an average age of 57 years and a predominance of males. Recently, the classification of its phases was modified to biphasic (chronic phase and blast crisis), with the chronic phase being the one that presents the best treatment results. The diagnosis is confirmed by the presence of the Ph chromosome and the BCR::ABL1 gene and the current therapeutic goal is to achieve minimal residual disease (MRD) and treatment-free remission (TRL). Objective: To highlight the incidence rate of new cases per year, demographic, clinical and molecular response profile of patients with CML treated with 1st and 2nd generation ITKs at the Fundação de Hematologia e Hemoterapia do Amazonas (F. HEMOAM). Methodology: The study was observational, retrospective, longitudinal and descriptive and evaluated patients with Ph+ CML diagnosed from 2011 to 2020 at F. HEMOAM. The data were tabulated according to the number of new cases per year, age, sex and origin, stage of the disease, Sokal score, type of transcript and BCR::ABL1 results. Results: The results demonstrated a total of 176 patients with CML, a mean age of 46.49 years and a predominance of males. The chronic phase of the disease was the most common at diagnosis (166/94.3%) and the Sokal score, among those classified, had the predominant high risk with 77 cases (43.7%). Regarding transcript subtypes, only 155 were classified, the most common being e14a2 (92/52.27%) followed by e13a2 (60/34.1%) and e13a2/e14a2 (3/1.70%). The molecular response found was confirmed to be earlier and more profound with 2nd generation ITKs. Of the 47 patients with more than four years of treatment, 24 achieved a sustained deep molecular response (18 with imatinib, 3 with dasatinib and 3 with nilotinib). Conclusion: The present study demonstrated the incidence of CML in a younger population in Amazonas and molecular response rates to 1st and 2nd line TKI that coincide with the literaturept_BR
dc.languageporpt_BR
dc.publisherUniversidade do Estado do Amazonaspt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectLeucemia mieloide crônicapt_BR
dc.subjectResposta molecularpt_BR
dc.subjectInibidores de tirosinoquinasept_BR
dc.subjectBCR::ABL 1pt_BR
dc.subjectChronic myeloid leukemiapt_BR
dc.titlePerfil demográfico e de resposta molecular dos pacientes com Leucemia Mieloide Crônica em tratamento com inibidores de tirosinoquinase na Fundação HEMOAMpt_BR
dc.title.alternativeDemographic and molecular response profile of patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia undergoing treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors at Fundação HEMOAMpt_BR
dc.typeDissertaçãopt_BR
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-08T13:40:12Z-
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Tarragô, Andréa Monteiro-
dc.contributor.advisor-co1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4644326589690231pt_BR
dc.contributor.advisor1Passos, Leny Nascimento da Motta-
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8194622149198642pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee1Passos, Leny Nascimento da Motta-
dc.contributor.referee1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8194622149198642pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee2Fraiji, Nelson Abrahim-
dc.contributor.referee2Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5204063085335824pt_BR
dc.contributor.referee3Costa, Allyson Guimarães da-
dc.contributor.referee3Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7531662673281014pt_BR
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4462885988879145pt_BR
dc.description.resumoA Leucemia Mieloide Crônica (LMC) é uma neoplasia de células tronco hematopoiéticas causada por uma translocação recíproca entre os cromossomos 9;22 que dá origem a um cromossomo 22 anormal chamado de Philadelphia (Ph). Esse episódio resulta um oncogene de fusão BCR::ABL1 responsável pela patogenia da doença. A incidência da doença corresponde a 15% de todas as leucemias em adultos, com idade média de 57 anos e predominância no sexo masculino. Recentemente, a classificação de suas fases foi modificada para bifásica (fase crônica e crise blástica) sendo a fase crônica a que apresenta os melhores resultados no tratamento. O diagnóstico é confirmado pela presença do Cromossomo Ph e do gene BCR::ABL1 e a meta terapêutica atual é atingir doença residual mínima (DRM) e remissão livre de tratamento (RLT). Objetivo: Evidenciar a taxa de incidência de casos novos por ano, perfil demográfico, clínico e de resposta molecular de pacientes com LMC tratados com os ITK de 1ª e 2ª geração na Fundação de Hematologia e Hemoterapia do Amazonas (F. HEMOAM). Metodologia: O estudo foi observacional, retrospectivo, longitudinal e descritivo e avaliou os pacientes com LMC Ph+ diagnosticados de 2011 a 2020 na F. HEMOAM. Os dados foram tabulados conforme o número de novos casos por ano , idade, sexo e procedência, fase da doença, score de Sokal, tipo de transcrito e resultados de BCR::ABL1. Resultados: Os resultados demonstraram um total de 176 pacientes com LMC, idade média de 46,49 anos e predominância no sexo masculino. A fase crônica da doença foi a mais comum ao diagnóstico (166/94,3%) e o escore de Sokal, entre os classificados, teve o alto risco predominante com 77 casos (43,7%). Quanto aos subtipos de transcritos, apenas 155 foram classificados sendo o mais comum o e14a2(92/52,27%) seguido do e13a2 (60/34,1%) e e13a2/e14a2 (3/1,70%). A resposta molecular encontrada confirmou ser mais precoce e profunda com os ITK de 2ª geração. Dos 47 pacientes com mais de quatro anos de tratamento, 24 atingiram resposta molecular profunda sustentada (18 com imatinibe, 3 com dasatinibe e 3 com nilotinibe). Conclusão: O presente estudo demonstrou incidência de LMC em população mais jovem no Amazonas e taxas de resposta molecular aos ITK de 1ª e 2ª linha coincidentes com a literaturapt_BR
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpt_BR
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Aplicadas à Hematologiapt_BR
dc.relation.referencesThapa B, Fazal S, Parsi M, Rogers HJ. Myeloproliferative Neoplasms. [Updated 2022 Aug 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19472396 2. Holyoake TL, Vetrie D. The chronic myeloid leukemia stem cell: stemming the tide of persistence. Blood [Internet]. 2017 Mar 23 [cited 2023 Jul 21];129(12):1595–606. Available from: https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/129/12/1595/36129/The-chronic-myeloid-leukemia-stem-cell-stemming 3. Rabian F, Lengline E, Rea D. Towards a personalized treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Curr Hematol Malig Rep [Internet]. 2019 Dec 23;14(6):492–500. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11899-019-00546-4 4. Tanaka K, Takechi M, Hong J, Shigeta C, Oguma N, Kamada N, et al. 9;22 Translocation and bcr rearrangements in chronic myelocytic leukemia patients among atomic bomb survivors. J Radiat Res [Internet]. 1989;30(4):352–8. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jrr/article-lookup/doi/10.1269/jrr.30.352 5. Jabbour E, Kantarjian H. Chronic myeloid leukemia: 2022 update on diagnosis, therapy, and monitoring. Am J Hematol [Internet]. 2022 Sep 6;97(9):1236–56. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26642 6. Hoffmann VS, Baccarani M, Hasford J, Lindoerfer D, Burgstaller S, Sertic D, et al. The EUTOS population-based registry: Incidence and clinical characteristics of 2904 CML patients in 20 european Countries. Leukemia. 2015 Jun 9;29(6):1336–43. 7. Hehlmann R. Chronic myeloid leukemia in 2020. HemaSphere [Internet]. 2020 Oct;4(5):e468. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/HS9.0000000000000468 8. Hochhaus A, Saussele S, Rosti G, Mahon F-X, Janssen JJWM, Hjorth-Hansen H, et al. Chronic myeloid leukaemia: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2017 Jul;28(Supplement 4):iv41–51. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0923753419421479 9. Haznedaroğlu İC, Kuzu I, İlhan O. WHO 2016 definition of chronic myeloid leukemia and tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Turkish J Hematol. 2020;37(1):42–7. 10. Hochhaus A. State of the Art in CML: Update. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Sep 1;21:S151–2. 11. Osman AEG, Deininger MW. Chronic myeloid leukemia: modern therapies, current challenges and future directions. Blood Rev [Internet]. 2021 Sep 1;49:100825. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0268960X2100031X 12. Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia [Internet]. 2020;34(4):966–84. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0776-2 13. García-Gutiérrez V, Breccia M, Jabbour E, Mauro M, Cortes JE. A clinician perspective on the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase. J Hematol Oncol [Internet]. 2022 Dec 11;15(1):90. Available from: 73 https://jhoonline.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13045-022-01309-0 14. Baccarani M, Deininger MW, Rosti G, Hochhaus A, Soverini S, Apperley JF, et al. European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013. Vol. 122, Blood. American Society of Hematology; 2013. p. 872–84. 15. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Protocolo clínico e diretrizes terapêuticas - leucemia mieloide crônica do adulto. CONITEC [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jul 4];528:104. Available from: http://antigo-conitec.saude.gov.br/images/Relatorios/2021/20210310_Relatorio_Recomendacao_528_-PCDT_Leucemia_Mieloide_Cronica_-adulto.pdf 16. Ministério da Saúde. Relatório de recomendação Protocolo Clínicos e Diretrizies Terapêuticas - Leucemia Mieloide Crônica de Crianças e Adolescentes [Internet]. 2021. Available from: http://conitec.gov.br/ 17. Castagnetti F, Gugliotta G, Soverini S, Baccarani M, Rosti G. Current treatment approaches in CML. HemaSphere. 2019 Jun 1;3(S2):54–6. 18. Han JJ. Treatment-free remission after discontinuation of imatinib, dasatinib, and nilotinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood Res. 2023;58(April):S58–65. 19. Braun TP, Eide CA, Druker BJ. Response and resistance to BCR-ABL1-targeted therapies. Cancer Cell [Internet]. 2020 Apr;37(4):530–42. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S153561082030146X 20. Neves WB das, Brito AM de, Vasconcelos AP, Melo FC de BC, Melo RAM. Incidence and spatial distribution of chronic myeloid leukemia by regions of economic development in the state of Pernambuco, Brazil. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther [Internet]. 2019 Jul [cited 2023 Jul 21];41(3):212–5. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2531137919300306 21. Neto GSL, Gomes CV, Nunes DV, Aguilar LB, Montenegro LHF, Galvão ND, et al. Perfil epidemiológico dos casos de leucemia mieloide crônica nas duas maiores cidades de mato grosso, Brasil, 2000-2016. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2020 Nov 1;42:130. 22. Aladağ E, Haznedaroğlu İC. Current perspectives for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia. Turkish J Med Sci. 2019;49(1):1–10. 23. Barbui T, Thiele J, Gisslinger H, Kvasnicka HM, Vannucchi AM, Guglielmelli P, et al. The 2016 WHO classification and diagnostic criteria for myeloproliferative neoplasms: document summary and in-depth discussion. Blood Cancer J [Internet]. 2018;8(2):15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41408-018-0054-y 24. Khoury JD, Solary E, Abla O, Akkari Y, Alaggio R, Apperley JF, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: myeloid and histiocytic/dendritic neoplasms. Leukemia [Internet]. 2022 Jul 22;36(7):1703–19. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-022-01613-1 25. Sokal J, Cox E, Baccarani M, Tura S, Gomez G, Robertson J, et al. Prognostic discrimination in “good-risk” chronic granulocytic leukemia. Blood. 1984;63(4):789–99. 26. Xiao-Shuai Zhang, Gale RP, Zhang M-J, Huang X-J, Jiang Q. A predictive scoring system for therapy-failure in persons with chronic myeloid leukemia receiving initial imatinib therapy. Leukemia. 2022;36(5):):1336-1342. 27. Aijaz J, Junaid N, Asif Naveed M, Maab R. Risk stratification of chronic myeloid leukemia according to different prognostic scores. Cureus. 2020 Mar 20; 28. Pagnano KBB, Miranda EC, Delamain MT, Duarte GO, de Paula EV, Lorand-Metze I, et al. 74 Influence of BCR-ABL Transcript Type on Outcome in Patients With Chronic-Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treated With Imatinib. Clin Lymphoma, Myeloma Leuk [Internet]. 2017;17(11):728–33. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2017.06.009 29. Su Y, Kuo M, Chen T, Wang M, Yang Y, Ma M, et al. Comparison of molecular responses and outcomes between BCR::ABL1 e14a2 and e13a2 transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Sci [Internet]. 2022 Oct 17;113(10):3518–27. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cas.15501 30. Jain P, Kantarjian H, Patel KP, Gonzalez GN, Luthra R, Shamanna RK, et al. Impact of BCR-ABL transcript type on outcome in patients with chronic-phase CML treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Blood [Internet]. 2016 Mar 10;127(10):1269–75. Available from: https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/127/10/1269/34945/Impact-of-BCRABL-transcript-type-on-outcome-in 31. Baccarani M, Castagnetti F, Gugliotta G, Rosti G, Soverini S, Albeer A, et al. The proportion of different BCR-ABL1 transcript types in chronic myeloid leukemia. An international overview. Leukemia. 2019;33(5):1173–83. 32. Branford S. Why is it critical to achieve a deep molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia? Haematologica [Internet]. 2020 Sep 17;105(12):2730–7. Available from: https://haematologica.org/article/view/haematol.2019.240739 33. Sacha T. Imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia: an overview. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013 Dec 31;6(1):e2014007. Available from: http://www.mjhid.org/index.php/mjhid/article/view/2014.007 34. Deininger M, O’Brien SG, Guilhot F, Goldman JM, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, et al. International randomized study of interferon vs STI571 (IRIS) 8-year follow up: sustained survival and low risk for progression or events in patients with newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP) treated with imatinib. Blood [Internet]. 2009 Nov 20 [cited 2023 Jul 21];114(22):1126–1126. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood.V114.22.1126.1126 35. Alves R, Gonçalves AC, Rutella S, Almeida AM, Rivas JD Las, Trougakos IP, et al. Resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia—from molecular mechanisms to clinical relevance. Vol. 13, Cancers. MDPI; 2021. 36. Breccia M, Alimena G. Second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (Tki) as salvage therapy for resistant or intolerant patients to prior TKIs. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2014;6(1)pt_BR
dc.publisher.initialsUEApt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DISSERTAÇÃO - PPCAH Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Aplicadas à Hematologia



Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.